Mark Wielaard writes: > Hi Matthias, > > On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 09:25 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > I filed bug reports for packages building with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, > > producing java bytecode for version 50, and which still depend on > > java-runtime5, or earlier (attached at the end). > > > > This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the > > default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac > > creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by older > > jvms. > > I thought all (free) runtimes accepted version 50 bytecode these days, > even if they say they implement only java-runtime5. Is this a problem in > practice? And if so against which runtimes? We might want to just fix > those runtimes.
problems were reported with at least sun-java5, which doesn't accept openjdk-6 bytecode. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
