On Fri, Jun 26, 16:53:10 +0530, Onkar Shinde wrote: > 1. Why are we trying to build CVS version instead of latest stable version?
That's what Petter did initially, and I didn't look at what was available upstream. > 2. The version number in the changelog says dfsg, but there is no > readme file justifying the dfsg string in version. I looked at > upstream source and didn't see any non-DFSG Free files in package. The changes are mentioned in the changelog. I guess I should have put the changes in README.source. > 3. How about changing the source package name to match the upstream > tarball name? You mean j3d? -- Jonny Lamb, UK [email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
