On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Partly. It's temporary for kfreebsd-* (see below) , the rest will stay gone > (everything except kfreebsd-* has OpenJDK available.) [...} > So it is, and yes, I plan to reenable it when gcc-defaults migrated (-gcj gets > a dependency on a newer libgcj-bc than in testing due to .shlibs)
This happened some while ago - but I am actually not sure whether libreoffice-gcj actually worked in the last months. The .jar.sos get built from .jars which get build wit gcj *but not shipped*. They would be in -common but that contains the jars built by openjdk from the upload. When I read http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcj/Invoking-gcj_002ddbtool.html I read ^ibgcj can use these databases to find a shared library corresponding to the bytecode representation of a class.". That "corresponding to the bytecode representation" worries me. Does that mean that the .jar.sos as been there didn't work as gcj/openjdk probably have fine differences? And so Either we need to - compile the jar.sos against -java-commons jars (b-d on itself on kbsd-*) - move the jars somewhere which can differ between openjdk and gcj archs - forget libreoffice-gcj doko, debian-java? Any hints? Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120718130216.ga11...@rene-engelhard.de
