Am 28.11.2012 22:07, schrieb Thorsten Glaser: > Dixi quod… > >> If one of you, either java or porter guys, has further suggestions, >> just tell ☺ > > That includes if I should stop bothering with -6 and try -7 > immediately, considering reading about #675495 now. The B-D > are there, nowadays. > > The goal might be to make m68k a non-gcj arch, so I don’t > know if -7 is appropriate right now.
If you want a reply from the OpenJDK packagers, please feel free to send email to them, or at least CC me. If you submit a patch for 6, please always send one for 7 as well. Don't patch the upstream source directly, but use debian/patches. debian-java seems to be the wrong list for questions about OpenJDK ports. distro-pkg-dev and zero-dev are the better choices (see http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo). fixed your patch and checked in for the -6 and -7 packaging. If you choose not to use the bootstrap approach, please enable running the tests, or at least some of them. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50ba6406.3050...@ubuntu.com
