Le 04/12/2013 00:08, Andrew Ross a écrit : > On 03/12/13 22:17, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> On 03/12/2013 21:22, Joachim Zobel wrote: >>> Am Montag, den 02.12.2013, 20:19 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru: >>>> Yeh. I tried to build it with an hardcoded dependency on java 6 but it >>>> failed. >>>> >>>> If someone could try to build a netbeans 7.0.1+dfsg1-6 in unstable >>>> (needed before going to stable), I will upload it. >>> Is that, what you tried? >>> >>> ---- debian/rules:----------- >>> export JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk-$(DEB_HOST_ARCH) >>> ----------------------------- >>> >>> I have pushed a first netbeans_7.0.1+dfsg1-7 to the repository >>> which (tries to) force openjdk-6. >>> >> Did you try that in a cowbuilder ? >> >> That is failing for me with: >> http://paste.debian.net/69194/ >> >> By the way, since -6 never been uploaded in Debian, you should merge >> your change of -7 in -6. >> >> Sylvestre >> >> > Ah, shame. I recognise this, it's because the version of ant has changed > in sid (it's now 1.9.2, compared to 1.8.2 in wheezy) and has a different > API. I don't see how we're going to create a package which builds in > both, and we'll certainly struggle to get the binaries built in sid to > run in wheezy. Well, in this case, Joachim, we should consider a different plan of action: * get in touch with the release team about the situation (that Debian unstable is too different from stable to upload first -6 in unstable without changes) * skip the -6 upload in unstable * wait for the next major release in unstable.
How does it sound ? Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/529f2be7.7080...@debian.org