Le 27/10/2014 14:34, Hilko Bengen a écrit : > What do you think about sidestepping that question altogether by > creating libguava-18-java? That's the way it's done when ABIs in shared > libraries are broken.
If the changes affect many reverse dependencies that's probably a good idea, but if it breaks only two packages I don't think we should duplicate the package. > I for one feel like manually checking 20+ packages would be a waste of > time. If you want I can check the first half and you the other half. Emmanuel Bourg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
