Le 05/07/2018 à 23:54, Vincent Privat a écrit : > I would probably have named the first one "src:eclipse-equinox-bundles", > unless there is a good reason not to do that. > Same for "libequinox": why not libeclipse-equinox? It's more verbose, > but I don't know if equinox is known outside of Eclipse?
I'm hesitating about this one too. I agree src:eclipse-equinox-bundles and libeclipse-equinox-*-java would be slightly more consistent with the other packages. I picked libequinox-*-java because there is already libequinox-osgi-java. Currently libequinox-osgi-java is built from sources fetched on Maven Central. Maybe we could refactor it to build from it's upstream repository (https://github.com/eclipse/rt.equinox.framework). That would add a src:eclipse-equinox-framework package producing a libeclipse-osgi-java package containing the org.eclipse.osgi bundle. Emmanuel Bourg