Il gio, 2002-01-17 alle 15:21, Daniel Stone ha scritto: > You might note the discussion on debian-kde of late, where Eray is > attempting to set a precedent by installing KDE3 into /opt/kde3. Let me > first disclose my viewpoint: I think this idea sucks, as you can clearly > see from my postings. > > My main concern is that we'll set a precedent here in Debian for this > sort of behaviour. AFAIK no Debian package has ever touched /opt; in > fact I'm pretty sure it doesn't even exist on a default install.
1. debian follows FHS as strictly as possible 2. FHS says that: 3.8 /opt : Add-on application software packages ... /opt is reserved for the installation of add-on application software packages. ... Distributions may install software in /opt, but should not modify or delete software installed by the local system administrator without the assent of the local system administrator. my oppinion here is that is *much better* to ignore /opt and reserve it for _third_party_ packaged applications (i.e., if FooSoft packages the Bar application using .deb format, would be nice to have it install in /opt/bar and not pollute /usr namespace [reserved for the OS vendor, i.e., Debian]). debian developers should stay away from /opt. ciao, federico -- Federico Di Gregorio Debian GNU/Linux Developer & Italian Press Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] INIT.D Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] The reverse side also has a reverse side. -- Japanese proverb
pgpUcH6zbXF5X.pgp
Description: PGP signature