-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > I'm not sure that in general there are really enough improvements to > actually be worthy of a change in major release number (from 2.x to 3.x) > because it feels more like a 2.3 release than a 3.0. The KDE 2.2 debs > (Woody anyway) were just as fast in my experience. Unless there is anything > you desperately need in KDE 3, I wouldn't rush madly to upgrade until the > debs are made.
Well, the reason they went to 3.0 is because of the binary-incompatability changes. The whole point of 3 what to switch to qt3 and cleanup any cruft left-over from their first attempts at the dcop/kpart solution. So, there wasn't supposed to be *major* changes, just ones that can't be made between, say, 2.1.1 and 2.2. As for the speed difference, are you using self-compiled bins, or pre-release .debs? I ask, because (supposedly) compiling things yourself causes a speedup, and that's what I did :-) - -- D.A.Bishop -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8qxcwEHLN/FXAbC0RArOmAJ42rdZL8VWRFYfNKy1AaFhs7MveyACdH3ur 2C80RGgeLqw6yLxd8GOTR0c= =Wwc1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]