On Tuesday 23 July 2002 1:17 pm, Chris Cheney wrote: > On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 12:56:15AM +0100, Nicolai P Guba wrote: > -snip- > > > I don't understand. What has gcc 3.0.1 to do with it. It's not even in > > unstable and I have been running it for years now. In fact, this one > > right here is 3.0.2 compiled with > > The original post was a typo, it was supposed to read 3.1.0, however > 3.1.0 was buggy and it appears 3.2 will probably be the one debian > switches to. GCC 3.2 should be released today, but I do not know how > long it will take to switch to it.
Ah! Indeed, I first tried getting it going with gcc-3.1 and I had no joy. Compiled alright but dcop didn't like it at all! Maybe I've got more luck with gcc 3.2. I'll definitively give it a whirl ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]