On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 13:25:28 +0200, Ralf Nolden wrote: [...] >The other thing is what version of Debian users want to run KDE on. I myself >would prefer woody, although testing and unstable are fine, too.
FWIW, just to register an opinion, my interest is solely in non-beta packages (just don't have time to test beta stuff right now - I need a working system), and for stability's sake only on Woody. So currently I'm only interested in KDE 3.0x packages for Woody, with all that implies (GCC 2.95, etc.). [I currently use Woody with official KDE 2.2] My 2p: a Debian archive should be created within kde.org to hold "unofficial" Debian KDE packages - not a KDE archive within debian.org. Regarding the creation of an "experimental" Debian, I'm inclined to agree with Ben Burton's concern that people would "add experimental to their sources.list and suddenly get all sorts of *other* experimental packages without realising it". Continuing to use people.d.o and other such places would also be fine, but makes it difficult for new users to find what they need. [Currently, I'm confused about where to get the KDE 3.0.4 debs from that I think I know I want - I believe I have the required information on this list somewhere, but have some collation work to do to figure it all out] A weekly posting to this list, of pointers to good locations for various KDE package archives would be an _excellent_ thing .. (Or even a daily posting - the speed with which development takes place at times !) Sorry, but I'm in no position to help - except maybe for working on documentation if that's needed (Ralf Nolden mentioned this). Tip o'the hat to all the packagers :) Nick Boyce Bristol, UK -- "Remember - friends don't send friends HTML e-mail"