-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am Mittwoch, 5. Februar 2003 09:04 schrieb Chris Cheney: > Sarge/Testing doesn't get security fixes is the primary reason not to > run it imho. Also it is horribly out of date due to the fact that libc6 > 2.3 still isn't in it.
So you think, tracking security.debian.org and recompiling some packages (apt-get -t unstable -b source) is not sufficient? You must be kidding to give the explicit advice to track unstable. And Woody does not even have current X without external packages which are not served with security fixes, too. Well, it does not have current libc6, either. So what? Anyway, is there _any_ sane reason that testing has not security apt source? HS - -- Mein GPG-Key ist auf meiner Homepage verfügbar: http://www.hendrik-sattler.de oder über pgp.net PingoS - Linux-User helfen Schulen: http://www.pingos.schulnetz.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+QNLzzvr6q9zCwcERAk05AKC3DveOQ3zW/WY08MEiqYeVRxFDOwCbBsLU xNc3gSs5jgNxkUj3BqqAEYU= =vqax -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----