On 6 May 2010 20:54, Mike Bird <mgb-deb...@yosemite.net> wrote: > On Thu May 6 2010 10:24:08 Dotan Cohen wrote: >> > Even with perfect packaging KDE SC 4 is slow and unreliable, >> >> Slow? Can you elaborate? I can help with that. >> >> Unreliable? In what way? > > Are you aware that KDE PIM developers noticed that the percentage of > KMail users on KDE-PIM's own mailing list has dropped below 50%? Even > KDE developers are fed up with KDE unreliability. >
No, I am not aware of that. I also don't use Kmail. > Did you check my email's user-agent string? No. Do you customarily read the complete email headers of those whom with which you correspond? > It's "KMail/1.9.9" - the > last Debian STABLE KMail. How come you're not using KMail if it's so > stable in KDE SC 4? > I cannot use Kmail until two feature requests are implemented: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72926 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159251 Thunderbird has this implemented as an extension: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/594 > Sune is not interested in working on KDE 3.5 but he's using slrn via > gmane. > > I have great respect for Ana's work but even Ana is using Mutt. > > Have you ever actually tried converting normal office workers from > KDE 3.5 to KDE SC 4? I have. Twice. Utter failure. > I have done tens of KDE 4 installs, and filed or triaged over 1300 bugs at KDE. I have installed KDE-based systems for home users, students, university laboratories, a library, and some small home offices. Am I qualified enough for you to tell me what's wrong already? -- Dotan Cohen http://bido.com http://what-is-what.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/p2o880dece01005061202xb6b00dbag1bc9731e28987...@mail.gmail.com
