Alle venerdì 19 luglio 2013, Diederik de Haas ha scritto: > On Friday 19 July 2013 12:18:19 Pino Toscano wrote: > > Ok then; just to tule out any other deb-multimedia issue, could you > > please check the output of > > $ dpkg -l '*' | grep ^ii | grep -- -dmo > > $ dpkg -l '*' | grep ^ii | grep -- -dmo > ii handbrake-cli 0.9.9-dmo3 > ii handbrake-gtk 0.9.9-dmo3 > ii mencoder 3:1.1.1-dmo4
These exist in sid/experimental, although slightly older.
> ii lame 1:3.99.5-dmo2
> ii libmp3lame0:amd64 1:3.99.5-dmo2
> ii libtag1-vanilla:amd64 1.8-dmo1
> ii libtag1c2a:amd64 1.8-dmo1
These exist in sid, and should better use them from there instead of
deb-multimedia.
> ii libdvdcss2:amd64 1.2.13-dmo1
> ii libfaac0:amd64 1:1.28-dmo3
> ii libx264-135:amd64 3:0.135.2345+gitf0c1c53-dmo1
> ii libxvidcore4:amd64 3:1.3.2-dmo1
> > ? I was able to install right now libavutil52 aside libavutil51 on
> > a current testing/jessie installation, so if there is a conflict
> > it would be indirect.
>
> Can you tell me which versions of those libraries you installed?
libavutil52 from experimental, of course.
> $ aptitude -s install libavutil52
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> libavutil52{b}
> 1 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not
> upgraded. Need to get 102 kB of archives. After unpacking 16.4 kB
> will be used. The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libavutil52 : Conflicts: libavutil-extra-51 which is a virtual
> package.
This conflict exists *only* in the libavutil52 provided in
deb-multimedia.
If you really want deb-multimedia in your repositories (which I do not
recommend), then you should better use apt's pinning to give to the
suites of this repository priorities lower than the ones for the main
archive (this implies also raising the priority for experimental to
more than 100, if you use it).
--
Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
