Am Sonntag, 4. Mai 2014, 23:13:17 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > Am Mittwoch, 23. April 2014, 16:51:09 schrieb Alan Ezust: > > Baloo is really trouble, at least in its current form. It made my > > upgrade/restore process (and every other process that I spawned after > > that) > > take a lot longer until I figured out how to disable it. > > > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333655 > > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=331932 > > Well, after fixing a long standing performance bug in Akonadi maildir > resource with the help of Sergio and David[1], I took also compiled all the > rest of kdepim and also Baloo, and I say: > > I am impressed. > > It indexed files and PIM data so fast I couldn´t even believe it. I don´t > know yet whether the index is complete, maybe some files are missing since > I stopped the file indexer manually once... but it finds mails, it finds > files… and that as well blazingly fast.
I don´t know how it could have indexed my mails that fast, but some tests shows that it works. I searched fulltext for a mail in kernel-ml folder with >245000 unread mails and it appeared instantly in search results. Sure, I cannot test this easily which each of the mails in there… but again: I am impressed. Truly impressed. I think it didn´t take more than half an hour to index the stuff. I even could watch the percentage progress in Akonadi console for the indexer agent increasing. I didn´t to measurements, but I wouldn´t be surprised is Baloo outperformed Nepomuk by a facter to 10 or 20 here. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/4361229.R2BOIFgNMv@merkaba