Hi Nicholas, Le 4 août 2024 01:12:19 GMT+02:00, Nicholas D Steeves <s...@debian.org> a écrit : >Hi Aurélien, >
> >What I understood was that whoever updated the source package believed >that our new bin:plasma-integration logically provided >plasma5-integration (whether or not it had formal Provides). I found >this reasonable and didn't question it. Yes but no. The new binary is plasma5-integration. It was just an oversight. > >Of course :) So in this case I wonder if it would save time to somehow >search for all versioned-2-unversioned bin:packages, and then add >Recommends for the old Qt5/KF5/Plasma5 variant, See above we're not in that case here. I'm not convinced we would save time with such a thing but if you want to explore that and share feedback, feel free. > run autopkgtests That would be very useful if it did anything. But it requires someone (upstream, us) to write some tests that can run under autopkgtest. autopkgtest [1] runs against the installed system, not from the build tree so you need something that tests the result of apt install $package, not of cmake+make. KDE didn't have that, that I now, but they started building some end user tests using Selenium ~recently. If $someone wants to look at KDE packages with selenium tests and can make them run as autokpgtests, I'd be very interested in merging such changes ! [1] https://manpages.debian.org/bookworm/autopkgtest/autopkgtest.1.en.html Happy hacking, -- Aurélien
