Your message dated Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:31:03 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#289990: ACPI problems with kernels 2.6.x for Dell Inspiron 4100 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2005 08:39:08 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 12 00:39:08 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from av4-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.112] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Coe20-0005cv-00; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 00:39:08 -0800 Received: by av4-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 70C9137E96; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:38:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp1-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.177]) by av4-2-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CA237E4D for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:38:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from em2.my.own.domain (h66n2fls301o1037.telia.com [81.227.209.66]) by smtp1-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C1E38017; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:38:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from srs by em2.my.own.domain with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Coe2X-00039R-00; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:39:41 +0100 Subject: ACPI problems with kernels 2.6.x for Dell Inspiron 4100 From: Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:39:41 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Sender: Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-1-686 Version: 2.6.8-10 Severity: serious This problem was reported to debian-deval and debian-kernel in November last year already. The net effect of failure to allocate IRQ 7 for ALSA is that it fails to start. The problems can be overcome by adding append="pci=acpi" or append="acpi=noirq" to lilo.conf. But, as these are workarounds, the cause should be corrected. I'll file a bug report on this if noone have an immediate solution? The problems heve been found for at least kernels 2.6.8 and 2.6.9. Maybe the BIOS has to be upgraded and/or there is something wrong with the PCI routing tables. >From dmesg: ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:00:1f.5[B] -> GSI 7 (level, low) -> IRQ 7 unable to grab IRQ 7 lspci shows: 0000:00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 01) #>cat /proc/interrupts CPU0 0: 2650500 XT-PIC timer 1: 1678 XT-PIC i8042 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 3: 11261 XT-PIC eth1 7: 0 XT-PIC parport0 8: 1 XT-PIC rtc 9: 0 XT-PIC acpi 11: 361 XT-PIC eth0, uhci_hcd, yenta, yenta 12: 51568 XT-PIC i8042 14: 3792 XT-PIC ide0 15: 0 XT-PIC ide1 NMI: 0 LOC: 0 ERR: 0 MIS: 0 For kernels 2.4.x ACPI is automatically disabled: ACPI: Subsystem revision 20040326 ACPI: Interpreter disabled. while kernels 2.6.x enables it: ACPI: Subsystem revision 20040816 ACPI: Interpreter enabled ACPI: Using PIC for interrupt routing ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (00:00) PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00) PCI: Ignoring BAR0-3 of IDE controller 0000:00:1f.1 PCI: Transparent bridge - 0000:00:1e.0 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0._PRT] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs 9 10 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] (IRQs 5 7) *11 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] (IRQs 9 10 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] (IRQs 5 7 9 10 *11) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.AGP_._PRT] ACPI: PCI Interrupt Routing Table [\_SB_.PCI0.PCIE._PRT] ACPI: Power Resource [PADA] (on) PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] enabled at IRQ 11 ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:00:1d.0[A] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11 ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:00:1f.1[A] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] enabled at IRQ 7 ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:00:1f.5[B] -> GSI 7 (level, low) -> IRQ 7 ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:00:1f.6[B] -> GSI 7 (level, low) -> IRQ 7 ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:01:00.0[A] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] enabled at IRQ 11 ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:02:00.0[A] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] enabled at IRQ 11 ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:02:01.0[A] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11 ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:02:01.1[A] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11 ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:00:1f.6[B] -> GSI 7 (level, low) -> IRQ 7 ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S3 S4 S4bios S5) ACPI wakeup devices: LID PBTN PCI0 UAR1 USB0 USB1 USB2 MODM PCIE MPCI ... Alocation of IRQ 7 does not seem to work: (this IRQ is allocated by parport0) ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:00:1f.5[B] -> GSI 7 (level, low) -> IRQ 7 unable to grab IRQ 7 Intel ICH: probe of 0000:00:1f.5 failed with error -16 The main problem is that alsa does not work. For alsa the audio device is not found: Running alsaconf or (/etc/init.d/alsa start when configured): ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:00:1f.5[B] -> GSI 7 (level, low) -> IRQ 7 unable to grab IRQ 7 /etc/init.d/alsa stop Storing ALSA mixer settings...ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:00:1f.5[B] -> GSI 7 (level, low) -> IRQ 7 unable to grab IRQ 7 Intel ICH: probe of 0000:00:1f.5 failed with error -16 failed. Running update-modules... Loading driver... Starting ALSA.../etc/init.d/alsa: Error: alsactl restore failed with message 'alsactl: load_state:1134: No soundcards found...'. done. Setting default volumes... -- Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------- Received: (at 289990-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2005 09:31:06 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 13 01:31:06 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Cp1Jp-00063c-00; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 01:31:05 -0800 Received: from sputnik (sputnik.itp.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.48.177]) by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A485C001 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:31:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from max by sputnik with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Cp1Jn-0001et-6k for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:31:03 +0100 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:31:03 +0100 From: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#289990: ACPI problems with kernels 2.6.x for Dell Inspiron 4100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Svante Signell wrote: > OK, kernel 2.6.10 works (I'll post dmesg if requested). The Audio card > gets allocated to IRQ 5, instead of trying to allocate IRQ 7. I also > updated the BIOS from A09 to A13, but this did not change anything. For > kernels 2.6.8 and 2.6.9 I still have to use pci=noacpi. Since kernel > 2.6.8 is planned to be shipped with Sarge, will the the changes made wrt > ACPI in 2.6.10 be back-ported to 2.6.8? The reason for setting the > severity to serious was with the sarge release in mind. ok great, thanks for your feedback. 2.6.8 is heavily stabilized for the upcoming release, there will be no hassle of a big acpi backport. debians 2.6.8 is only left open for security updates, that are currently on the way. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]