On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 06:46:26PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote: > > kernel with proprietary firmware to be a violation of their license. > > Period. This is a fact: _Copyright holders of material Debian is > > distributing believe we are doing so in violation of the license they > > have granted us_. This is a serious problem, both in terms of BTS > > severity and most legal codes. > > Who actually objects to this that has contributed signifigant code to > the kernel? Is there a list, and what they have contributed?
Adam Richter and me for example. Note that these are both in context of files that have a GPL-incomaptible license boilerplate on them and not the usual firmware wankfests.