Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 03:33:06PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: >> Hi, Sven Luther wrote: >> >> > And sorry, upto now, your only arguments where dogma, white space and the >> > monolitic nature of the patch. >> >> If you s/dogma/experience with handling kernel patches/, all three points >> are entirely valid reasons to reject a patch. (NB: you want "were".) >> >> Split the thing now. You'll save yourself a whole lot of future work, >> bugs, and frustration. > > And in the meantime, the user gets left in the Cold. I still don't see
Its also quite off the mark for amd64. The last kerel version had a 0 Byte patch for amd64 and only the current one has some patches in there to fix recent bugs. Its not like amd64 has a 2MB big diff between upstream and usable sources like mips-cvs has (had). MfG Goswin