On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 12:06:38 +0900, Horms wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 12:15:51AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: >> Alright, enough people are bothering me for 2.6.10 that we should probably >> get it into sid. I've committed a bunch of bk backports to the svn 2.6.10 >> k-s directory (small, obvious fixes for the most part); I'm going to aim >> for uploading 2.6.10 into NEW either Wed. or Thurs. unless anyone has >> objections. > > I'd like to advocate that we remove 2.6.9 when 2.6.10 is added.
Assuming 2.6.10 doesn't blow up horribly on people's systems; sure. :)