On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 01:33:09PM -0700, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #312714: initrd-tools: swsuspend requires an extra line in order to avoid 
> filesystem corruption,
> which was filed against the initrd-tools package.
> 
> It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
> maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> 
> Their explanation is attached below.  If this explanation is
> unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
> message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email.
> 
> Debian bug tracking system administrator
> (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
> 
> Received: (at 312714-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jun 2005 20:18:40 +0000
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 09 13:18:39 2005
> Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228] 
>       by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
>       id 1DgTU7-0002wQ-00; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 13:18:39 -0700
> Received: from sputnik (stallburg.stro.at [128.131.216.190])
>       by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1C45C00F
>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu,  9 Jun 2005 22:18:04 +0200 (CEST)
> Received: from max by sputnik with local (Exim 4.50)
>       id 1DgTTq-0000Yt-GS
>       for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 22:18:22 +0200
> Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:18:22 +0200
> From: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Bug#312714: initrd-tools: swsuspend requires an extra line in 
> order to avoid filesystem corruption
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
> X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
>       (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
>       autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
> X-Spam-Level: 
> 
> On Thu, 09 Jun 2005, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> 
> > according to
> > 
> >     http://www.suspend2.net/HOWTO-2.html
> 
> that's a strange piece of junk.
> use it on your own risk.
>  
> > you need this:
> > 
> >     echo > /proc/software_suspend/do_resume
> > 
> > BEFORE the script mounts your filesystem. If the line is missing, your
> > system will not resume. If the line comes after mounting file systems,
> > you will most likely suffer from filesystem corruption. You have been
> > warned.
> > 
> 
> well initrd-tools is another piece of junk and
> is on the way to be replaced.

 ah - is it to be replaced with something that happily supports udev
 inside it?

 and the enabling of selinux?

 if there's a wish-list, i would LOVE to see proper support / detection
 for selinux, and the use of uclib-compiled udev in an initrd, just like
 there is in FC2-FC4

 doing a udev-aware debian/selinux, whilst still keeping
 the "bog-standard-non-selinux-aware" initrd, is a complete
 half-way-house dog's dinner.

 it would actually be better, like gentoo, to _not_ have an initrd at
 all, when deploying udev+debian+selinux.


> debian-kernel currently don't support suspend so this anyway a noop.
 
 well it is and it isn't.

 i would expect to be able to download the debian kernel, with its
 .config file, patch it, update it, compile it... 

 yes?

 [i do this all the time.]

 so it's not exactly "a noop".

 l.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to