On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 16:55:42 +0300, Horms wrote: > On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:39:55PM +0300, Andres Salomon wrote: [...] >> - i'm leaning towards using gcc-3.3, as i'm afraid of gcc-4.0 >> miscompiling things. however, if any architectures require gcc-4.0, >> either let me know, or update svn directly. > > How are you planing to do that. > I need to do something about the fact that users go and > grab kernel-source-2.4.27 and it doesn't compile with the > default gcc any more. Here are three solutions I have thought. > > 1. Document this somewhere > 2. Change the makefile to default to gcc-3.3 > 3. Change the makefile to print out a nice error if gcc version >=4.0 > > In all cases it seems it would be good to recommend gcc-3.3. >
Actually, enough people on IRC have said that gcc-4.0 works for that, that I'm not convinced gcc-3.3 is necessary. I'm on the fence, I could go either way. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]