On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:26:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 11:04:07AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> The DI kernel udebs (linux-kernel-di-<arch> source) takes the > >> kernel-image deb, splits it up into kernel and several groups of > >> modules and builds udebs. There is no Depends there and can't be to > >> keep the kernel-image debs available. > >> > >> > >> kernel-image-di-arch ---source---> linux-kernel-di > >> | > >> magic > >> | > >> \/ > >> kernel-tree-X.Y.Z-N <---depends--- kernel-image > >> | > >> \/ > >> kernel sources > >> > >> > >> The 'magic' part is the problem. > > > > I don't follow why there is a problem with linux-kernel-di > > depending on kernel-tree-X.Y.Z-N. > > > > -- > > Horms > > The problem is that the DAK will update linux-2.6, kernel-tree-x.y.z-n > and kernel-image packages without any regards to linux-kernel-di. They > will become out of sync and end up without source -> GPL violation. > > In the old setup kernel-source-2.6.8 will remain until removed manualy > and linux-kernel-di has that as source.
But kernel-source-x.y.z.N provides kernel-tree-x.y.z-n for 1 <= n <= N Surely this resolves the problem some people percieve with regards to the GPL. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]