On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:46:04PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:18:46AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 05:19:07PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 07:43:31AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > Not a good idea. Why clutter the namespace of versions in order to > > > > adapt to > > > > non-debian needs. ? What is it you intent to do anyway ? > > > > Thanks to Bastian Blank, code was added to make your life easier, > > /proc/version now shows the debian version after the kernel version as : > > > > (Debian 2.6.13-1) > > > > For example, not yet in released packages, and will not account for self > > compiled kernels from the debian sources, but it should be usefull to you. > > Yes, that's nice thanks! > > Could you show me a full /proc/version?
10:49 < waldi> Linux version 2.6.13-1-powerpc64 (Debian 2.6.13-1) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.0.2 20050821 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.1-6)) #1 SMP Wed Sep 14 09:28:56 UTC 2005 > It's unfortunate my current client isn't logging /proc/version yet, so I > should update the client soon. Logging /proc/version is a good idea > anyway to know the compiler used. Indeed. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
