On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 04:50:26AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 11:19:37AM +0900, Horms wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:35:47AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > (...) > > Thanks, hopefully we can get to the bottom of this sooner rather > > than later > > I hope so too :) > > > With regards to pcmcia-modules-2.4.26-i386. > > I notice that pcmcia-modules-2.4.27-i386 exists and presumably works. > > I've CCed the maintainer, Per Olofsson for comment. > > Ok, either way, since 2.4.27 exists, I won't let pcmcia-modules-2.4.26 block > removal. > > > > > kernel-latest-2.6-amd64 > > > > > > Ditto -- shouldn't this one be simply superseded by packages generated by > > > a > > > next upload of linux-2.6? > > > > amd64 still doesn't seem to exist for linux-2.6, I'm not sure why, > > perhaps I am just blind or looking in the wrong place > > > > http://ftp2.jp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/l/linux-2.6/ > > > > However, once it is uploaded, it will have binary packages with > > the same names as those previously produced by the > > kernel-latest-2.6-amd64 source package. Does this mean that > > kernel-latest-2.6-amd64 will automatically be removed, or automatically > > flagged for removal? > > Yes, if all binary packages of a give source package are 'hijacked' by another > package, the source package will be automatically flagged for removal, and > packages automatically flagged for removal will be removed by an ftp-team > member every few days. > > So, no action needed, and not removing will ensure a smooth transition.
Thanks, I'll prepare a fresh list for you ASAP. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]