On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 04:09:50PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > what happened to the patch producing the small busybox deb > > that iniramfs-tools needs? > > What is the problem with using the udeb? > > > did you accept the patch from jeff bailey? > > I don't find a patch or even bugreport in the bts.
anonymous irc log: <a> initramfs-tools uses busybox internally. Rather than having a massive symlink farm, it uses the busybox shell option that tells it to try to use internal modules rather than external ones: CONFIG_FEATURE_SH_STANDALONE_SHELL=y <b> debian/config-static:CONFIG_FEATURE_SH_STANDALONE_SHELL=y the default config don't have a shell for third party readers ;) no patch needed from busybox side for initramfs. -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]