On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 02:58:19AM +0200, Thiemo Seufer wrote: > Horms wrote: > [snip] > > > > > As for if it is ready for upload? I am not sure. You are > > > > > the one propmoting uploading 2.6.12-7. I certainly think > > > > > that the addition of the 2.6.13.1 and 2.6.13.2 patches that > > > > > I added makes it more ready for upload. So if you though > > > > > it was ready yesterday, then yes, its ready today. > > > > > > > > > > I'm doing a 2.6.12-7 build now. I'm happy to upload this > > > > > if others are happy. But I am still not entierly sure why > > > > > there is a push to get 2.6.12-7 ready, and thus I am not entirely > > > > > sure what it should include. > > > > > > > > FWIW, I would like to see 2.6.12-7 as basis for the mips kernels in > > > > the next days. > > > > > > I spoke a bit more to Sven about this on IRC, > > > and it looks like we will go ahead with what we have. > > > I have the binaries built (i386) and will upload > > > once I get a final go-ahead from Sven. > > > > > > I even tested that they boot and am running one of them now :) > > > > Sorry, I am a bit confused, does this mean you want to see > > a 2.6.12-7 upload ASAP, or you would like the upload to wait a few days? > > I hope to fix the remaining issues which should not happen in an kernel > from unstable in the next days here in Oldenburg. So I don't need the > newer kernel-source immediately but in the next 3-4 days, earlier is > better but don't feel pressed to rush something.
If Svenl hasn't uploaded already, I anticpate that the release will happen today. Thanks for clarifying the mips situation for me. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
