Robbie Harwood: > Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> writes: > >> Ok - as I understand it, what we are dealing with here is: >> >> * systemd: You can get gssproxy + NFS and it "just works(tm)" if >> you install gssproxy. Otherwise you get svcgssd + NFS. >> (This is how I understood Neil Brown) >> * sysvinit: Business as usual either way. >> >> >> So granting gssproxy will: >> >> * Provide systemd users with NFS + gssproxy if they opt-in to it >> (by installing it) >> * Provide sysvinit users gssproxy and if they want to use it with >> NFS, they may have to tweak things themselves >> * Not cause any issues for neither systemd users nor sysvinit users >> just by installing it. >> * enable users to get gssproxy which is not deprecated (unlike the >> existing svcgssd) >> >> Is the above correct? And you are happy with gssproxy/0.5.1-2 as it is? > > That sounds right. And yes. >
Ok, exception granted. gssproxy should migrate later today. ~Niels
