On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 21:21 +0200, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Quoting Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>: > > Still, as armel will not be a release architecture any more, I > > suppose > > it can diverge further from the normal configuration. > > I didn't know, that this already has been decided. > Could you point to the emails about this? Thanks!
I don't know about emails, but the status page says it is not a candidate: https://release.debian.org/buster/arch_qualify.html Ben. -- Ben Hutchings For every complex problem there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
