On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 11:15:04AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 10:13:05 +0200 > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 08:19:14PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > > > If not, why? > > > > > > > > I guess generic miscomprehension, or whatever. The fact that > > > > ubuntu uses initramfs-tools for example, and so on. > > > > > > I would guess similarly. My interest was (and still is) actual > > > concrete reasons from those (if any) not interested. > > > > > > Silence as response to both questions (from all but you and I) I > > > dare interpret as "we have already decided on initramfs-tools and > > > are either too lazy or too busy to even shed light on the issues we > > > have with yaird". > > > > Please interpret it as too busy to reply right now, as many in the > > kernel team are over-worked with RL stuff these days :) > > Ok - I apologize for being rude. > > What does "RL" stand for?
I guess Real Life. There has been a distinct lack of activity in the kernel-team over the past week or so. I agree with Sven's analysis that this implies people are busy. I for one am in that camp, though I am doing kernel stuff today. Unfortunately this isn't getting us much closer to resolving yaird vs initramfs-tools or any other issues relating to 2.6.13 and beyond. I am, right at this moment, building 2.6.13-1.experimental.1, and assuming the i386 build completes I will upload. I already know it doesn't compile on HPPA, and I expect other FTBFS. On the other hand, it will probably work quite nicely on enough architectures that there is a benifit to users. In any case, hopefully having some release out there will get some more energy back into getting 2.6.13 and beyond into Etch. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
