On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:58:10PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:31:18PM +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 06:58:55PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > > Do you have a link to it ? And does it support using yaird as alternative > > > ? Or > > > running initrd 2.4 or pre-2.6.12 kernels ? > > > > it's supporting initrd-tools on hppa and ia64 afaik. > > > > > The above proposal works with kernel-package just fine. > > > > ok so i misunderstood you. > > > > > > my proposal is just to localize changes, so that we clearly know, > > > > what broke? > > > > > > > > releasing a new upstream version and changing the early boot stuff > > > > in the same time needs to be avoided. > > > > > > I don't follow you on this. > > > > the idea is to to have early boot change without any other bunch of > > usual fixes and changes. they would be noise for that transition. > > I higlhly oppose doing a 2.6.13-2 upload just for that, it would be a giant > waste of auto-builder time. > > > Oh well, i guess it will be no worse than previous failed upload attempts ...
I have uploaded 2.6.13-1 now. I am pretty sure it will FTBFS on many architectues. So lets spin -2 some time soon. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
