On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 06:09:46PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Subject: src:linux: none
> 
> It looks like you forgot to include a subject line?

*sigh* Computers are hard.

> The relevant series is a4b28f5c6798 (Merge remote-tracking branch
> 'kvmarm/kvm-arm64/stolen-time' into kvmarm-master/next, 2019-10-24).
> It may be possible to try applying it if you are interested.

That is the series I had in mind, yes.  I will open a merge request once
I have one prepared and tested.

> That said, for this kind of issue that is about new features instead
> of hardware support, my advice would be to use a more current kernel
> from backports instead.

That's not an option for users requiring security support.  While the
prevelance of arm64-based clouds is still relatively low, it is growing.
As it becomes more common, the lack of visibility into CPU steal time
will become a significant issue for people running in these
environments, hence the "important" severity.

noah

Reply via email to