On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 06:09:46PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > Subject: src:linux: none > > It looks like you forgot to include a subject line?
*sigh* Computers are hard. > The relevant series is a4b28f5c6798 (Merge remote-tracking branch > 'kvmarm/kvm-arm64/stolen-time' into kvmarm-master/next, 2019-10-24). > It may be possible to try applying it if you are interested. That is the series I had in mind, yes. I will open a merge request once I have one prepared and tested. > That said, for this kind of issue that is about new features instead > of hardware support, my advice would be to use a more current kernel > from backports instead. That's not an option for users requiring security support. While the prevelance of arm64-based clouds is still relatively low, it is growing. As it becomes more common, the lack of visibility into CPU steal time will become a significant issue for people running in these environments, hence the "important" severity. noah
