On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Ingo Oeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> This is known bug. For fixing this bug cleanly, we will need to much
> >> change the both of nls and filesystems.
> >
> > Using per locale collation sequences? :-)
> >
> > Do you know, how Windows handles the problem of differing collation
> > sequences on the file system?
>
> I don't know. Why do we need to care the collation sequences here?
>
> > Or is the file system always dependend on the locale of the Windows
> > version, which created the file system?
>
> Probably, yes. I think we need to know on-disk filename's code set.
If FAT stores the filenames in 8 bits (non-UTF) then yes, it will be in
the current locale/code page of the Windows system writing them (e.g. that
happens with the names of EAs in NTFS).
If the names are stored in 16-bit Unicode like on NTFS then obviously they
are completely locale/code page independent. (Makes my life in NTFS a
_lot_ easier. Especially since the NTFS volume contains an upcase table
for the full 16-bit Unicode which we load and use to do upcasing for the
case insensitive comparisons...)
Best regards,
Anton
--
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net
WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
