Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 03:58:54PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:43:07 +0100, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> >> > As discussed on irc, we still need to find out why the new k-p break >> > (or whatever you want to call it) the linux-2.6 control file >> > mechanism, and thus we end up with missing dependencies on the >> > linux-image packages, which break the ramdisk-tool upgrade path. >> >> > Please don't upload the package to unstable until we know what is >> > going on, and fix it, but i guess that was always your intentions. >> >> Well, as it turns out, it was not kernel-package breaking the >> dependency mechanism, it was the linux-2.6 control file not playing >> nice with dpkg-gencontrol, so the only thing holding kernel-package >> back is a request from the kernel team to wait until the -3 release. > > Indeed, and all the issues i was aware of have been solved now, so as far as i > am concerned the 10.00x k-p can go in unstable, not sure if we should use it > for -3 directly or not. > > Sorry for the confusion about this, i seriously believed you where uploading > to unstable.
I've been away from my desk for a few days, well other than occasionaly popping in on IRC. If I'm not deeply mistaken 2.6.14-3 is now out there, and was released using k-p 9.008.4. 10.00x seems to be in pretty good shape now, unless something nasty is lurking deeper in my INBOX. Manoj, please upload at will. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
