On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 2:48 PM Olaf Skibbe <n...@kravcenko.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 14:15, Karol Herbst wrote: > > > mind retrying with only fb725beca62d and 62aecf23f3d1 reverted? > > I will do this later this day (takes some time, it is a slow machine). > > > Would be weird if the other two commits are causing it. If that's the > > case, it's a bit worrying that reverting either of the those causes > > issues, but maybe there is a good reason for it. Anyway, mind figuring > > out which of the two you need reverted to fix your issue? Thanks! > > I can do this. But if I build two kernels anyway, isn't it faster to > build each with only one of the patches applied? Or do you expect the > patches to interact (so that the bug would only be present when both are > applied)? >
How are you building the kernel? Because normally from git reverting one of those shouldn't take long, because it doesn't recompile the entire kernel. But yeah, you can potentially just revert one of one for now and it should be fine. > Cheers, > Olaf >
