On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 01:13:16AM -0700, dann frazier wrote: > On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 04:12 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > > BTW, also, about ia64 situation, is it possible to use yaird in > > > initrd case still ? I know Eric was disabling this for 0.12, but we > > > are still using 0.11 ? > > > > Yaird 0.0.11 is newest release - so it _will_ be removed but _was_ not > > yet. > > > > It is deprecated due to lack of testing. So if someone starts testing > > it then Erik might get convinced to keep it: > > Replace /etc/yaird/Templates.cfg > > with /usr/share/doc/yaird/examples/Debian-initrd.cfg.gz gunzipped > > should do the trick. > > ia64 will work fine with yaird once a new elilo is uploaded - this is > planned for next week. See #338185.
Ok, so the initramfs/ia64 problem was elilo related ? We can close that RC bug against linux-2.6 once this is done, right ? > Though the above fix also gets us into a initramfs-tools provided > userspace, klibc seems to have a dynamic linker problem on ia64. See > #341181. Since sarge shipped with both 2.4 and 2.6 kernels for ia64, I > believe this leaves us with a broken upgrade path. Yes, but a broken upgrade path for etch once released, we can propagate linux-2.6.14 to etch/testing for now though. > I just discovered that 2.6.14-4 is not booting on ia64, while 2.6.14-3 > did. In fact, a rebuild of 2.6.14-3 on sid doesn't work either - looks > like a binutils problem. 2.6.15-rc2 seems to work fine w/ latest > binutils though. Mmm, it seems that Pascal also has some trouble with 2.6.14-4 (altough self built one). Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
