On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 12:26:25AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Thursday 01 December 2005 00:09, Sven Luther wrote: > > Yeah, but the change from ARCH=ppc | ARCH=ppc64, to a single re-unified > > ARCH=powerpc kernel will not go without glitch, especially for the > > lesser subarches (oldworld, prep, apus come to mind), and may cause > > some sever disfunction in even the mainline arches, let's hope this > > will be resolved before the 2.6.15 release though. > > Getting it in d-i beta2 may be an opportunity to get some testing exposure > for lesser arches, so that may be worth considering even if there are > some known issues. We could easily make a note about it in the errata.
Hehe, i guess i will be able to test most of the lesser arches myself, except apus, and well, oldworld miboot will not work, and benh told me oldworld/bootx is currently broken, altough he hoped to have the fix in time for 2.6.15. > Given the major impact on ppc, is it an option for the kernel team to > upload 2.6.15 to experimental first, so we keep a little bit more room > for maneuvering towards the d-i release? Nope, we will upload the -rc kernels to experimental, but i don't think we should upload the actual released kernels to experimental, those should go into sid, and preferably the day of the release. That said, we have a few weeks, and working on the -rc tree in experimental should help sort out all issues, hopefully. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]