Hi Noah, On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 02:16:04PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 07:58:56PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Speaking for the kernel-team: No, if we want that change in stable and > > for the 6.1.y kernel then it should be accepted upstream in the 6.1.y > > series. As alternative your employer might use backports kernel? > > The kernel change was introduced with 6.13, so backports doesn't help > yet. I'll work with my employer's kernel folkѕ on getting the kernel > change applied to the 6.x LTS branches, and will revisit this with the > cifs-utils maintainers once it's available there.
Just for clarity, yes I know, the target kernel for trixie will be 6.12.y based, what i meant is once we have backports there. Sorry that I was not clear about it. Regards, Salvatore
