[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: > On Jan 04, Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Not to mention that 2.6.15 requires a newer udev. Who knows what other newer >> things newer kernels might require. > OTOH, old kernel are buggy and out of date wrt modern hardware, and we > lack the manpower to backport for years fixes and new features RHEL-style. > Do you have a better solution?
Why don't we use RHEL's kernel, or collaborate with them to maintain a stable kernel tree, or something? -- Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]