Hi Jonathan, On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 10:43:26PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 04:38:49PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 10:40:28AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > > > > > Hi Salvatore, > > > > > > Sorry I have not responded yet, I've been too busy and had to prioritise > > > other things. > > > > > > On Thu Apr 24, 2025 at 1:57 PM BST, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > > Accordingly going to close now the bug. If you feel though strongly > > > > taht it is not okay please *do* reopen, but in that case we really > > > > would need your help for the above. > > > > > > I intend to work on this post-Trixie. I personally would find it useful if > > > the bug was open: Between first discovering it, and finding the bug and > > > useful information in it; and when I hit the bug a second time, a year or > > > more later, it took me longer to find the useful information because the > > > bug > > > was closed and archived. However, I won't re-open it myself without your > > > consent. > > > > Given you have a clear intent to work on it post-trixie, let's reopen > > it. I do not want to hide things, just make things more easy for us > > for issues which are not anymore relevant. > > > > With your above statement, lets keep it open for now. > > Did you had a chance to look into this? otherwise as stated earlier it > it would be helpful to not keep bugs open for years and close it.
Any news here? Or should/can we go ahead and close the bug? Regards, Salvatore
