On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:43:28PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: > > > On Jan 04, Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Not to mention that 2.6.15 requires a newer udev. Who knows what other > >> newer > >> things newer kernels might require. > > OTOH, old kernel are buggy and out of date wrt modern hardware, and we > > lack the manpower to backport for years fixes and new features RHEL-style. > > Do you have a better solution? > > Why don't we use RHEL's kernel, or collaborate with them to maintain a > stable kernel tree, or something?
or http://members.optusnet.com.au/ckolivas/kernel/ -- Chris. ====== Reproduction if desired may be handled locally. -- rfc3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
