Your message dated Sat, 24 Jan 2026 17:04:21 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1126348: linux-modules-6.19-amd64: unsigned modules
scrool errors and disable critical utilities
has caused the Debian Bug report #1126348,
regarding linux-modules-6.19-amd64: unsigned modules scrool errors and disable
critical utilities
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1126348: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1126348
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: linux-modules-6.19-amd64
Version: 6.19~rc6-1~exp1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
linux-image-6-19~rc4 works and I missed linux-binary-6.19~rc5 and the usigned
modules in Linux-modules-6.19~rc6 are showing scroolling errors during kernal
install (see attached file ) and during update-grub that hides grubs stdout.
I've also seen mount XFS v5 fail as well as logging in as root. Different
debian instalations show different problems depending on SYS configuration,some
less effected than others and this is not an issue for me to just use the
6.19~rc4 or 6.18 kernals since they both work nicely.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: forky/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.19-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages linux-modules-6.19-amd64 depends on:
ii linux-base-6.19-amd64 6.19~rc6-1~exp1
linux-modules-6.19-amd64 recommends no packages.
linux-modules-6.19-amd64 suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
[ 1720.723790] XFS (sda6): Mounting V5 Filesystem
437fffa9-fada-424c-94a9-f97c7de1d731
[ 1720.966562] XFS (sda6): Ending clean mount
[ 1933.836963] dm_mod: module verification failed: signature and/or required
key missing - tainting kernel
[ 1933.844210] BPF: [121685] TYPEDEF
[ 1933.844414] BPF: type_id=121700
[ 1933.844602] BPF:
[ 1933.844805] BPF: Invalid name
[ 1933.845000] BPF:
[ 1933.845194] failed to validate module [dm_mod] BTF: -22
[ 1933.921159] BPF: [121685] TYPEDEF
[ 1933.921503] BPF: type_id=121700
[ 1933.921711] BPF:
[ 1933.921917] BPF: Invalid name
[ 1933.922129] BPF:
[ 1933.922336] failed to validate module [dm_mod] BTF: -22
[ 1934.027926] BPF: [121685] TYPEDEF
[ 1934.028316] BPF: type_id=121700
[ 1934.028543] BPF:
[ 1934.028846] BPF: Invalid name
[ 1934.029093] BPF:
[ 1934.029323] failed to validate module [dm_mod] BTF: -22
[ 1934.148977] BPF: [121685] TYPEDEF
[ 1934.149402] BPF: type_id=121700
[ 1934.149652] BPF:
[ 1934.149900] BPF: Invalid name
[ 1934.150149] BPF:
[ 1934.150395] failed to validate module [dm_mod] BTF: -22
[ 2108.548632] audit: type=1400 audit(1769266327.092:118): apparmor="DENIED"
operation="open" class="file" profile="/usr/sbin/cupsd" name="/etc/paperspecs"
pid=6414 comm="cupsd" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0
[ 2108.697580] audit: type=1400 audit(1769266327.240:119): apparmor="DENIED"
operation="capable" class="cap" profile="/usr/sbin/cupsd" pid=6414 comm="cupsd"
capability=12 capname="net_admin"
[ 3124.022581] XFS (sda6): Unmounting Filesystem
437fffa9-fada-424c-94a9-f97c7de1d731
[ 3140.707860] XFS (sda6): Mounting V5 Filesystem
437fffa9-fada-424c-94a9-f97c7de1d731
[ 3140.895365] XFS (sda6): Ending clean mount
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jan 24, 2026 at 10:56:17AM -0500, VVill Chell wrote:
> [ 1933.836963] dm_mod: module verification failed: signature and/or required
> key missing - tainting kernel
> [ 1933.844210] BPF: [121685] TYPEDEF
> [ 1933.844414] BPF: type_id=121700
> [ 1933.844602] BPF:
> [ 1933.844805] BPF: Invalid name
> [ 1933.845000] BPF:
> [ 1933.845194] failed to validate module [dm_mod] BTF: -22
You failed to reboot after uprading the kernel. So you try to load
incompatible kernel modules. No bug.
Bastian
--
Immortality consists largely of boredom.
-- Zefrem Cochrane, "Metamorphosis", stardate 3219.8
--- End Message ---