-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Aug 04, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> think not? Prove it by proposing a GR. More importantly, the release team >>> I had such a plan, but no time to implement it currently. >> How do you handle the fact that it is a license violation making the >> thing illegal to distribute? > I see that the lawyers of SuSE and Red Hat do not believe this to be > true or at least do not consider it a problem, and this is enough for > me to ignore the opinion of the debian-legal@ armchair lawyers.
Could they have signed license agreements that we (not being executives of RHAT and Novell) don't know about? - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Is "common sense" really valid? For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins are mud people. However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE1ANpS9HxQb37XmcRAmswAKDF5zCi6C4FIzDfGHvz2RPj2OgfaACbBwj8 A1nxGf1PgNvdXV1bwL090zM= =5gfY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
