On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 10:10:37AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 09:48:21AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 09:20:52AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 01:41:17AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > > > tags 391626 +patch > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > As the mol maintainer I would really appreciate it if you could include > > > > my patch before the etch release. The patch is already in the bug log > > > > since about a month. > > > > AFAICS a new upload of linux-modules-extra is needed anyway for > > > > linux-image-2.6.18-2-*. > > > > > > > > Please contact me if you need additional information or assistance. If > > > > you are busy with other things I can also prepare an NMU. > > > > > > Installing linux-support-2.6.18-2 and building the debian/control with it > > > fails with : > > > > Ok, i applied it with the gencontrol.py patch excluded and without mol in > > the > > main defines. > > > > Gaudenz/Bastian, can you look over the gencontrol.py failure and fix the > > patch ? > > It seems that Bastian already applied the patch in SVN. The current SVN > builds without problems for me (and the resulting mol modules work). > > As there needs to be another upload for 2.6.18-2 anyway I hope that the > mol modules will be included.
There will be an upload for -3, and mol should be included then. > > But my test build failed in unionfs due to sioq.h missing, so there will be > > need of some work for 2.6.18-2 anyway. > > unionfs is currently deactivated in SVN. Indeed. We solved this quickly after i wrote that mail. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]