On Fri, 18 May 2007 23:17:50 +0200 maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok, proposition is for example to change update_initramfs to all > and let the postinst of i-t, uswsusp, mdadm, usplash and so on > check against that setting before running -u or -u -k all. > file bug reports against any package that don't check against.. Right, such a propsal was in my initial mail and patch, with the exception that I used debconf instead of a config file. In a later mail I named a config file as an alternative... > update_initramfs is already settable in /etc/i-t/update-initramfs-conf So can we now agree on this? If 'update_initramfs = yes' in that config file, then a package should run with '-u' with 'all' it should run '-k all'. Would you like me to create a patch for the postinst of i-t? grts Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
