From: Martin Habets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 01:07:46 +0100
> On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 03:59:21PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > Alternatively we can have a KCONFIG variable with reversed > > logic, like "EMULATED_CMPXCHG" which only the atomically > > challenged platforms need to set. > > Like this idea, but if we're not going to build DRM I see no > point adding the cmpxchg emulation to sparc32. Maybe "NOARCH_CMPXCHG" > would be better? It is likely that we are going to have generic users of cmpxchg() in the kernel in the future (I think the -rt patch set has some which are hard to get rid of) at which point we'd probably put the emulated cmpxchg() in there anyways. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
