On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 08:51:31AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:45:02PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > > Has been rejected a few times. An now that we actually have kvm > > > for powerpc in tree MOL should just merge with that project and > > > do the right things in tree instead of beeing a really hacky > > > module subverting the VM. > > > > We don't have KVM for the "classic" 32-bit PowerPC processors, only > > for the 44x family. And doing KVM for the classic 32-bit processors > > would probably involve just as much hackery as MOL. :) > > I don't think so. Doing it properly in-tree will mean that it is > > a) properly reviewed > b) means we can do the major VM bits in the kernel without these > really stupid exports > > Have you looked at MOL recently? It's more than disgusting. > > And in addition to these issue we do of course as policy not add > random hooks in the kernel tree for out of tree stuff. Especially > for hacks like this that don't even have the intention to get merged.
This is not true anymore. See my other message to this thread. Joseph Jezak is working on a mergeable module. Gaudenz -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
