On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 08:07:25PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > That's just adding an arbitrary 5 days delay. Uploading to experimental > > won't uncover new issues, because nobody uses packages in experimental.
> Uploading it to sid, will make a revertion to .25 much harder if > needed. Besides that, we'd need to know if it _at least_ builds on all > architectures and then be ready to upload meta packages... No, it really would be a waste of time. 2.6.25 is already in testing, so t-p-u is still there as an update path; but no one on the kernel side is really considering 2.6.25 to be an option for lenny, and the sooner we get 2.6.26 into unstable the sooner we can get everything smoothed out for lenny. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
