On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 12:30:05PM +0300, Arturas K. wrote: > > hi, > > >The support for featuresets != none in linux-patch-debian-X is not > >official. > > I somehow filed to understand yours replay. I guess you filed to > understand my request too. So lets try again: > > * I filed the bug report on linux-patch-debian-2.6.26 because I read > somewhere filing bug reports on source packages is not a good practice > > * 2.6.25-7 [testing] has vs2.3.0.34.11.patch, it is enabled, and > produces linux-image-2.6.25-2-vserver-* deb's (I like them) > > * 2.6.26-2 [unstable] has the same patch and it is disabled. > > * according to berlt, this patch should apply on 2.6.26 too (I did not > tried this) and vise versa, the most curent vs2.3.0.35.diff should > safely apply onto 2.6.25 (in case lenny will ship with this one) > > * despite all this "safely apply or not", vs2.3.0.35.diff has the most > recent bug fixes, tested upstream on stock 2.6.26.2 and is the most > feature complete release > > * unless there are restrictions imposed by lenny freeze, I see no reason > why next upload to unstable can't have vs2.3.0.35.diff instead of > vs2.3.0.34.11.patch and vserver kernel images re enabled. even if freeze > is the reason - I am ready to stand for my reasoning in front of > release managers and ask for permission to update the patch... > > * I know you guys are busy - so am I, but I am eager to try and help on > this particular feature.
please stop waffling. if you checked current sid repo you'd see that waldi turned on vserver feature with latest patch, plus there was a mail/irc request for testing snapshots. and no 2.6.25 is *not* the lenny linux-2.6 release version. over and out -- maks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
