-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 04:52:21PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: >On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 03:42:09PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 03:02:43PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: >> >On Thu, 04 Sep 2008, Robert Millan wrote: >> > >> >> On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 02:14:28PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: >> >> > severity 493925 wishlist >> >> > stop >> >> >> >> I don't want to play BTS ping-pong, but this severity change is >> >> not right. Would you please revert it? >> > >> >if it would. >> > >> >> > as always stupid Debian wolf crying - disconnected from upstream >> >> > work. checkout 2.6.27-rcX they already ported several drivers to >> >> > request_firmware and if you *had* checked out linux-next you >> >> > would see that even more is in the pipe. 2.6.26 is not the right >> >> > cut off. >> >> >> >> Isn't .26 the version that will be used for lenny? >> > >> >sure but as always these firmware guys only come creeping out of >> >there cages too late. >> >> So bug severity is based on timing now? > >great take things out of context. > >2.6.26 is released and 2.6.27 merge window is over. >for any one wanting to work on this issue the tree is open for 2.6.28, >checkout linux-next for missing request_firmware() drivers.
This is Debian BTS, not upstream. Yes, I know that Debian kernel team has a policy of not diverting too far from mainline upstream source, but that does not excuse lowering severity of bugs. A bug is a bug even if it can't/won't get fixed. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkjAV98ACgkQn7DbMsAkQLihMgCePsRBMRiZsiXL/WyWyANSoVs1 6wAAn15Il95q8QCpm+x03KLpf7Zor4Ms =fI6Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]